What is oral assessment?

What is oral assessment?

By Dr Jeremy Koay

A limited view

The goal of standardised assessment in general is to test learners’ knowledge and ability to perform a particular task. In the context of language assessment, some countries tend to focus on reading and writing skills. This focus has negative consequences. For example, a lack of attention to oral assessment may result in fewer speaking activities in a classroom.

Fluency and pronunciation are sometimes given more emphasis compared to other aspects of oral communication. While fluency is important, other aspects, such as coherence and task achievement, are equally important. In terms of pronunciation, Carey, Mannell, and Dunn (2011) found that ‘foreign’ accent influences examiners’ perception of candidates’ overall oral proficiency.

A holistic view

Because standardised tests are expected to have high test validity, a set of descriptors is provided to help examiners evaluate candidates’ abilities. The descriptors for assessing speaking skills usually include fluency, intelligibility, grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation and the ability to produce complex grammatical structures.

Although these descriptors are useful, it is important to acknowledge that a speaking test is itself a unique communicative context (Fulcher, 2015). For example, unlike in a casual conversation, there is pressure to perform in a speaking test because the stakes are high. In addition, a test candidate is expected to have a conversation with an examiner who is likely to be a complete stranger, a task that not everyone is comfortable performing.

Theory and practice

Being aware that some test candidates may not feel comfortable talking to strangers, examiners could start a test with small talk to help candidates feel comfortable. In my view, a friendly and relaxed environment provides a conducive platform for candidates to display their speaking skills at an optimal level.

If a test does not allow an examiner to have small talk with a candidate, another option would be for test administrators or ushers to help candidates relax before their speaking test starts.

An understanding of a speaking test as an artificial communicative event should lead to a different way of understanding speaking test scores. Rather than relating a test score to a candidate’s speaking skills, the score should be read primarily as a reflection of how the candidate performs in a test context.

References

Fulcher, G. (2015), Assessing second language speaking. Language Teaching, 48(2), 198-216.

Carey, M. D., Mannell, R. H., & Dunn, P. K. (2011). Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews? Language Testing, 28(2), 201-219.


Dr Jeremy Koay is a New Zealand-based Independent Researcher and a Research & Development Consultant at EduMaxi. He obtained his PhD in Applied Linguistics from Victoria University of Wellington in 2015. His research interests include Discourse Analysis, Genre Analysis and TESOL.

Image source: shutterstock.com/Dragon Images

Like & Share Post
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.